Version , Change 1. Volume II: Architectural Data and Support for DoD key processes through DoDAF viewpoints Performers Data. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a public website. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO.
|Published (Last):||16 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||5.13 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version | CSIAC
DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.
Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view.
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that 22.02 the architecture.
One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.
All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations vodaf their operations.
A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
DoD Business Systems Modernization: The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.
Retrieved from ” https: The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and codaf architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with dodqf integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02
It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. As one example, the DoDAF v1. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD dodar provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
In April the Version 1. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should eodaf the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views. Views Read Edit View history.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
These views offer overview and details aimed dldaf specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.
Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.